People will look at the pics of 5d2, 5d and d700 and say: Would you confide in a camera which on a black and white surface creats blotches of pink, green, blue, etc.? How this camera would behave depicting the real scenery? Undoubtedly it would add such tiny colorful blotches in any contrasting boundary, adding color which does not belong there. Have a look for example at white labels with text on them, do you see how the 5d2 creates color blotches around letters? I noticed the same on the test pics from other sources as well.
CANON FULL FRAME SENSOR DSLR ISO
In that metric the Canon 5D2 has about 65% more pixels per cm 2 than the Nikon D3/D700 and Canon 5D, and keeping up in high ISO performance with those cameras would be quite a feat. Where the new Canon does suffer is in comparison to sensor density of other full-frame sensors. All else being equal the high ISO noise should be at least as good as an 8 to 10MP Canon sensor. The point is that any issues the 5D2 may have with noise are not the result of pixels being "too small". In fact, sensor density on the 5D2 is significantly lower than the 10MP Canon 40D, which has a density of 3.1. This is very much at odds with the ridiculous claims many on the web are making about full-frame cameras going too high in resolution. At 2.4MP per cm 2 the 5D2 still exhibits a lower density and theoretically better high ISO performance than any current APS-C DSLR. The last column does put into perspective the true potential of the full-frame sensor and sheds some light on the true meaning of Canon's 21.1MP sensor and Sony/Nikon's 24.6MP A900/D3x sensor. There are a few surprises here, such as the Sony A350 being essentially the same density as the Canon XSi, and the new Canon 50D having the highest density of any current DSLR camera. The lower the density, the larger the individual pixel size, and the more information that pixel can gather - all else being equal. Here the resolution of the sensor is divided by the sensor area to yield a sensor density. The last column in the chart is the one that tells the story most accurately, however. With a range of 28.1% to 42.4% of full-frame size, there is clearly a lot more information that can be potentially captured with a full-frame sensor. As you can see in the chart below, the APS-C sensors aren't even half of the area of a full-frame sensor.
Thus the reverse is true in sensors in that larger sensor size is almost always better, with everything else equal. However, the digital sensor is not a digital device instead, it's an analog device that gathers light and converts it into a digital signal. In the computer world, smaller and smaller traces mean higher density, more transistors, and generally better and faster performance. On the Canon 5D Mark II and other full-frame DSLR cameras lenses behave exactly as they would on 35mm, with no crop factor. The smaller APS-C sensor used in most other cameras results in the lenses appearing to be 150% to 200% longer than the marked focal length. Compare this to most other DSLR cameras today, where the sensor size is closer to APS-C size. The new Canon 5D2 compares very well to the reolution of the recently introduced Sony A900, which at 24.6MP is the highest resolution currently available in a full-frame camera. The 5D2 sensor is approximately the size of a frame of 35mm film, which is 24x36mm, and resolution is 21.1MP - a significant increase from the original 5D at 12.8MP. Canon had this market all to their self for the first two years, but during the past year Nikon and Sony have both introduced several models to compete in the full-frame DSLR market.
CANON FULL FRAME SENSOR DSLR UPDATE
The Canon 5D Mark II is the update to the camera that created the $3000 full-frame DSLR market - namely the Canon 5D in 2005.
0 kommentar(er)
